Sunday, September 27, 2009

Pilots

Having recently conned a vessel over the Columbia River Bar, I am frequently asked if I took on a pilot to assist in the transit. The questioner is often surprised to that I “acted as” pilot, but there is nothing particularly mysterious about being a pilot. “Pilotage” is simply navigation using local knowledge. A person who does this is a “pilot.” On the other hand, when we refer to a pilot in the modern maritime industry, we are probably talking about a professional mariner who specializes in guiding ships through a particular area. It is the difficulty some of these areas present — like the Columbia River Bar or, in a different way, the Panama Canal — that lend a mystique to the job.

The only real qualification you need to be a pilot is local knowledge that a captain from outside the area — called a “stranger” — doesn’t possess. And that knowledge can be very localized indeed. For a time early in the decade, the port at Cabo San Lucas, Mexico required ships to take on a harbor pilot. He came out in a water taxi, shook hands with the captain, and sipped a cup of coffee while he yelled at charter fishermen to get out of the way. The whole trip was a straight line less than half a mile long from the “pilot station” to the dock. Between the short trip and the yelling, he didn’t even have time to finish his cup of coffee. Compare that to the Chesapeake Bay pilots, who have to learn 200 miles of some of the most traveled waterway in the Americas. Pilots who have to deal with large areas may work in teams, with one on the bridge while the other one sleeps.

In the United States, most areas require a pilot to have a Coast Guard license and hold a First Class Pilot certification for the area in which he — or in many instances she — will be sailing. This usually means logging a certain number of trips through the area and then taking a written test, which includes hand drawing relevant landmarks, aids to navigation, danger areas, and so on on a blank chart.

Pilots frequently have several decades of experience at sea — the average age of a Puget Sound pilot is 55 years old. While this experience is valuable, it can also be challenging for middle-aged and older pilots to meet the physical demands of the job, like climbing up a long pilot ladder after jumping onto it from the deck of a pilot boat (like one picture above, stationed in Astoria, Oregon near the mouth of the Columbia River) heaving in the surf. Pilots also face the same medical issues we all do as we get older, including ever more crowded medicine cabinets. In fact, use of medications by the pilot on the Cosco Busan (see my post May 30 post) was taking were cited as a root cause of resulting oil spill.

For Professional Mariner's report on Chesapeake pilot Lynn Diebert's 2007 death in the line of duty, see http://www.professionalmariner.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=420C4D38DC9C4E3A903315CDDC65AD72&nm=Archives&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&tier=4&id=3FC8BCC0CD7A4099843C125B2F035226For The journal's report report on the 2006 death of Columbia River Bar pilot Kevin Murray, see http://www.professionalmariner.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=420C4D38DC9C4E3A903315CDDC65AD72&nm=Archives&type=Publishing&mod=Publications%3A%3AArticle&mid=8F3A7027421841978F18BE895F87F791&tier=4&id=B669C6C389B94734BA193E3BD9EC8DFE

Filed from M/V Spirit of Discovery in Portland, Oregon

Sunday, September 6, 2009

Halibut Wars

“Charter fishing is organized crime,” reads a bumper sticker on a car in Sitka, Alaska. Even more to the point is a sign on a door in Pelican: “I’d rather have a daughter in the whorehouse than a son charter fishing.” Strong words, and they are an indication of the stakes over who may fish where and when, and how much they can catch.

At odds are commercial fishermen and sport fishing charter operators. In recent years the commercial fishing industry in Alaska has changed a lot. Where commercial fisherman once they caught as many of a given fish as they could and sold them at the best price possible, concerns about overfishing and abuses by the big seafood companies led to the institution of the IFQ (Individual Fishing Quota) system in 1995. Now, each permit holder is legally able to catch up to a certain limit and sell it at a set price. As a result this system, the number of boats engaged in commercial fishing dropped dramatically and the number of fisherman working at sea has dropped as well.

But are sport fishing charter operators also commercial fishermen covered under this system? They say no, and point out that low limits on the number of fish (especially halibut) they can keep adversely effects their business by keeping customers away, sending them off to parts of the world without such limits. The commercial fisherman protest that the point of the quota system was to help keep the fishery sustainable, that their allowable catch of halibut in particular has dropped 50 percent in the last two years, and that charter fishermen are asking for more than their fair share of a limited resource.

This is not the first time there has been a dustup over fishing rights in or near Alaska. Back in 1997, Canadian fisherman in Price Rupert, British Columbia surrounded the Alaska state ferry Malaspina, keeping it from leaving in protest over what they saw as US and Alaskan incursions onto their fishing grounds. More recent concerns about sustainability have lead to fights between fisherman and farmers, fishermen and loggers, and even a war of resolutions over the breaching of Snake River dams between the city councils of Pasco, Washington and Seattle.